REVIEWS
| Fictionalizing Recent Death-Row History

A
Reverence for Redemption: Establishing Actual Innocence or Reversible
Error
Reversible Errors
by Scott Turow
Farrar Straus Giroux, New York
433 pages, $28.00
Criminal Defense Weekly. Oct. 12, 2002.
By Jordan Elgrably
Attorneys rarely
have time to read fiction these days, it seems, but if you read
anything at all for entertainment, youll be warmly surprised
by Scott Turows latest novel. In fact, you might find that
Turow (who has practiced law since the late 70sfirst
as a Chicago prosecutor before going over to the defense side)
has much more in mind than spinning a good yarn. For without question,
this is a literary novel, which has as its purpose the demonstration
of a new way of seeing the world.
While the books narrative construction appears conventional
on the face of it, what is striking here is the nuance of character,
the very shadings Turow applies to criminal justice professionals
who are fallible to a (wo)man. His novel approach lies in the
extent to which every protagonist or antagonist is fully three-dimensional;
drawn, that is, with complete human fallibility. If defense attorney
Arthur Raven is Turows alter ego, for instance, the author
doesnt stop at candid descriptions of Ravens height
(short!), hair line (receding!), and success with women (dont
even go there!). To me what seems most novel about this work of
fiction is that it seamlessly combines all the usual conceits
of a literary work with the more or less predictable demands of
a serviceable suspense thriller.
This is Raymond Chandler and Hemingway in one rollercoaster narrative.
Now that the work has been effusively praised and weve got
that out of the way, lets look at the issues Turow raises.
Rommy Squirrel Gandolph is a Death Row defendant,
known as a Yellow Man, who has just about exhausted
every possible appeal. At the end of his days, the State assigns
corporate lawyer Arthur Raven and his new young associate, Pamela
Towns, to Gandolphs case. With 33 days before execution,
Raven and Towns have little hope of unearthing any new evidence;
besides which, there is the inconvenience of Squirrels jailhouse
confession, shot on videotape by lawman Larry Starczek.
Why bother, some might ask, and Im sure just about every
reader will. But then you have to wonder, what is Turow going
on about in over 400 pages?
The
reality is that Turow has carefully crafted his story based on
many of the known facts of infamous Cook County, Illinois cases,
in which police and prosecutors overzealously put away several
innocent men in the 1980s and 1990s. Thanks to Cardozo Law Schools
Innocence Project
(the brainchild of O.J. attorneys Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld)
and the Center
for Wrongful Conviction at Northwestern University, over 100
Yellow Men have been exonerated nationwide, based
on claims of actual innocence or reversible error. Almost always,
DNA testing provides the basis for defense claims that the State
must reverse the convictions of men who seem doomed for the death
house.
Scott Turow always wanted to be a serious novelist, and even considered
going freelance while a creative writing student at Stanford,
before he began practicing law. Instead, according to his publishers
biography, Turow became a partner in the Chicago office
of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, a national law firm with
600 lawyers. Mr. Turows practice centers on white collar
criminal litigation. Mr. Turow devotes a substantial part of his
practice now to pro bono work, including representations in cases
involving the death penalty. In one of these matters, Alejandro
Hernandez, co-defendant of Rolando Cruz, was exonerated after
11 years in prison.
Rolando Cruz and Hernandez were in fact tried and convicted in
Cook County. Turow sets all of his Illinois novels in the fictional
Kindle County, but few locals can miss the similarities. Arthur
Raven becomes amorously involved with a former judge convicted
of taking bribes; Cook County had such a judge. But while in reality
we would know little or nothing about such a persons recovery
or rehabilitation, Turow has the luxury, in the fiction process,
of exploring just what makes such a person tick, and how they
make their way back from the valley of the damned.
You might expect a lot of characters in white and black hats in
a legal thriller, but in Reversible Errors, every hat is
multicolored some with more shades of gray than others.
When the corrupt judge comes clean with Raven, out of prison now
after a seven-year hitch, we learn that, I dont think
the money changed the outcome of any of those cases. No one can
say for sure, least of all me, and thats what makes what
I did so insidious. But it was a system, Arthur, almost like a
tax. The lawyers got rich, so the judges were entitled to a share.
It would be fair to say that Scott Turow, the omniscient narrator,
saves reverence for nothing and no one in the legal field; instead,
his reverence is reserved for the stark possibility of redemption.
Indeed, it is the novels real killer, the hidden hoodlum,
who admonishes Raven never to give up on a mans one-in-a-million
capacity to turn his life around, against all odds.
With Rommy Gandolph, weve got a defendant out of his depth,
who has an IQ not much above retarded. Such defendants, as we
know, have been relatively easy prey for coerced confessions;
and in fact several of the exonerated men who left Death Row in
the past year or two have been victims of coerced jailhouse confessions,
later thrown out on appeal.
Turow would know a bit more than the average defense attorney
about the holes in the criminal justice system; he was one of
14 people who spent nearly two years on the Ryan
Commission on Capital Punishment, trying to determine exactly
how and why so many defendants were nearly executed by the State
of Illinois, despite their actual innocence. Ultimately, that
commissionand this noveltell us in almost Dickensian
depth how and why the system is flawed, and how race and class
and education play a role in whether the accused gets life, or
death.
Back to Top